After Taliban’s
debacle and influx of Al Qaeda from their safe sanctuaries in Afghanistan to
the tribal areas of Pakistan, Pashtuns as an ethnic group have come under an intense
scrutiny of political scientists, sociologists and anthropologists. The fact
that Al Qaeda and Taliban were not just able to establish themselves in the
tribal areas of Pakistan, but in fact successfully initiated a bloody
insurgency against the US supported regime in Kabul and Pakistan have led some scholars to develop
diverging hypothesis to explain the Islamist violence emanating from the
region. The cultural fallout of some these hypotheses have been that, perhaps, Pashtun
culture itself contains element that justifies violence for political causes.
Since
the nature of violence committed by Al Qaeda and Taliban is overtly religious,
and the fact that these groups thrive in some of the Pashtun areas, along with
Pashtuns own religiously charged social outlooks, have led some scholars to see
Pashtun culture as largely compatible with the political values propagated by
the militant groups.
It is
true that Pashtun regions, specifically the tribal areas and the regions in
Baluchistan that borders Afghanistan, have provided significant number of foot
soldiers to Taliban regime in Afghanistan. But main support has come in the
form of students-cum- Jihadis provided by the networks of seminaries that were established
with the support of Pakistan and United States to support Afghan Jihad during
the 1980’s. These seminaries had been the main source of accommodation and
educational opportunities for the children who came as refugees to Pak-Afghan
borders areas during the first Afghan Jihad. This was the generation that grew
up in a social and political environment that was instigated and supported by
Pakistan, United States and allies to support the holy war against the Soviet
Union. This was the generation that grew up under the
violent shadows of the first Afghan Jihad.
Tragic political fallout such an environment that glorified the notions
of holy war has been a grown generation that sees such violence as the only meaningful
political approach.
Despite
such stereotyping about the Pashtuns, the empirical facts on the other hand seems
to speak against any general cultural trend that may explain some of the
Pashtuns support to religious violence. A study by team of professionals from
Princeton, Georgtown and Standford University
shows that Pashtun areas in Pakistan are least supportive of the
terrorists group such as Al Qaeda and Taliban. This is because its the Pashtun
who have paid the heaviest human, social and economic cost due to the terrorist
violence during the last decade.
In one
of my recent studies, a random sample of the profiles of 329 terrorists were collected from Counter
Terrorism Wing of the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) of regional
police offices in Pakistan. The data describes in detail about the demographic
and socio-economic background of the terrorists. Final statistics show Khybar
Pakhtunkhwa which makes almost 13 percent of Pakistan total population contributes
approximately only 10 percent in the sample of terrorists. It implies that
there is no over representation among the terrorists by the Pashtun living in
the Pashtun dominated province of Khybar Pakhtunkhwa. However, Federally
Administered Tribal Areas (FATA), another Pashtun dominated region is over
represented by margin of approximately 6 percent.
Since there
are varieties of terrorism organizations which operate in Pakistan, I further
disaggregated that data to determine whether there is any over representation among
Pashtuns in case of religious terrorists such as Taliban or Al Qaeda. Again,
the results show that it’s the Punjab and FATA region which makes up the
special regions as far as the contribution to the sample of religious militants
is concerned. Specifically, when terrorists, who are simultaneously affiliated
with Taliban as well as other religious organizations such as Al Qaeda are take
into account, the share of Punjab increases to mighty 78 percent as compared to
its share 54 percent in total population.
The
reason that FATA region is over represented whereas Khybar Pakhtunkhwa does not
indicate any unique cultural pattern among
Pashtuns as religiously more violent. Even in the case of FATA, there is no
uniform pattern that explains religious violence. For example, not all Taliban
fighters in FATA condone that fight against the State of Pakistan. Also, not
all Taliban condones the global jihad ideology of Al Qaeda. Lack of any evidence for a uniform pattern of
recruitment to religious terrorist organization among Pashtuns implies that the
roots of terror are not located into cultural factors. The specific economic
and political profile of FATA further implies the necessity to look at the root
causes that make some people substitute their allegiance to violent
organizations as Taliban and Al Qaeda instead of the State.
Recently
a report was published on District Education Ranking in Pakistan by Islamabad
based team of professionals who the run the education campaign by the name Alif
Ailaan. They developed an index giving weights to the quality of education, the
availability of infrastructure and level of learning. According to the report,
North and South Waziristan, the two most affected regions score abysmally low
and falls at 144th and 145th rank respectively, only to
be followed by Kurram Agency and FR Kohat. This is just one statistic that
shows the terrible absence of one of the basic fundamental right of FATA people
as supported by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of United Nations. Successive Governments of Pakistan, whether
military or democratic, have been unwilling to abolish the Frontier Crime
Regulation (FCR), an oppressive ordinance that legalizes the use of collective
punishment, through which the State have ruled FATA. It is the lack of basic
necessities of life and any political stake whatsoever in the system that has
led some people to support the radicalizing solutions offered by Taliban and Al
Qaeda. Instead of looking at cultural reasons
and dwell into hopelessness about political solution to the crisis, the war
against terror requires the addressing of fundamental issues to raise the cost
for people to support the terrorist
organizations.
No comments:
Post a Comment